There is definitively a difference between my RD-2000 vs any Virtual Piano Instrument. It's not that i can heard the delay but i can feel it.and i only play thru headphone I always notice a delay/latency when i switch from my onboard Roland piano sound to any virtual piano instrument. I always do my daily piano practice using the "onboard" sound of my Roland RD-2000 keyboard. My current rig is a imac with a i9 processor + 64gig of ram. I've start playing piano/keyboard about six months ago.My main goal is to open a new world of musical creativity using IdProduct 0x2509 JMS539 SuperSpeed SATA II 3.I've been in the "music business" for the last 30 years,a guitar maniac with a small but "high quality" home studio. Min/avg/max/mdev = 5.8 ms / 5.9 ms / 6.3 ms / (42 us)īDeviceClass 0 (Defined at Interface level) (ext4 /dev/sdd1): request=2 time=333 usġ2 requests completed in 11.5 s, 2.3 k iops, 9.1 MiB/s (ext4 /dev/sdd1) ioping statistics -ġ1.3 k requests completed in 3.0 s, 3.8 k iops, 14.8 MiB/s (ext4 /dev/sdb1) ioping statistics -Ģ.8 k requests completed in 3.0 s, 952 iops, 238.0 MiB/s Motherboard: Asus Z87 Gryphon w/ USB 3.0 port.
More Details follow All Tests Run On An Intel 80GB First-Gen Drive, X25-M.ĭirect-Access ATA INTEL SSDSA2M080 02HA PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
The rest below are merely details on the above. The point of this table was to add some latency and iops stats in a non-theoretical comparison.
Of course, this will be different for different setups. On an ASUS Z87 motherboard with an intel i7-4770K with gobs of memory and ubuntu 14.10, the rough performance comparison of a first-gen Intel 80gb SSD drive (X25-M), using the ioping utility on an ext4 filesystem, the following is a rough estimate of read-performance: SPEC: 250MB/sec,
0 kommentar(er)
